SDVOSB · FL

Funders, boards, and councils want proof.
We build it.

Program evaluation, surveys, and outcomes reporting for nonprofits, public programs, and the people they answer to. Fixed fee. Independent. Principal-led.

For nonprofits · counties & cities · foundations · public programs

Services

What we do

01Program Evaluation

Process and outcome evaluations tied to your funder's measures.

02Survey Design & Analysis

Satisfaction, stakeholder, and community surveys: designed, fielded, analyzed.

03Needs Assessments

Assessments and environmental scans that ground your next grant in evidence.

04Data Analysis & Reporting

We clean, analyze, visualize, and narrate the data you already have.

05Evaluation Retainer

An evaluator on tap across your programs, with first-in-line scheduling.

Inside a program evaluation

Four stages, start to finish

Every evaluation moves through the same four stages, so you always know where your project stands.

1Consultation

We start with your stakeholders and your funder's requirements.

2Evaluation planning

An evaluation plan you approve: the questions, the measures, the timeline.

3Data collection & analysis

Surveys, interviews, and records, analyzed against the plan.

4Reporting

A funder-ready report in plain language, with a findings briefing.

How it works

Three steps, no surprises

01Short scope call

Tell us what you need to prove and to whom. We ask the counting questions.

02One fixed number

A written scope and a single price. If the scope grows, we re-scope in writing.

03Funder-ready delivery

A funder-ready report and a findings briefing, on a timeline set in your written scope.

See what you get

A short, funder-ready sample report shows our format, rigor, and plain-language findings before you commit. And for the full picture, read our public demo report: a complete, decision-grade analysis of Florida's children's-services funder layer, built entirely from public records, every figure traceable to a named primary source. Every real engagement is tailored to your program and your funder's requirements: these show the standard, not a fixed template.

Why RSC

Rigor at a small organization's budget

Right-sized and affordable

Rigorous evaluation scaled to your grant, not big-firm pricing.

Independent credibility

Third-party results a funder trusts more than self-report.

Responsive, principal-led delivery

Intel-analyst rigor, not an academic calendar. Your timeline is set in writing.

Honest deliverables

Methods stated, limitations disclosed. If a deliverable falls short of what we promised, we make it right.

Who's behind RSC

An analyst, not an agency

Bryan Rojas, founder of Rojas Strategic Consulting

Bryan Rojas, founder. Service-disabled U.S. veteran.

I spent six years as an intelligence language analyst, turning messy, high-stakes data into decisions leaders could act on.

That same discipline now goes into every evaluation and funder report I deliver.

And independence is the point: an outside evaluator with no stake in the result is exactly what funders trust.

My standard is honest scales (Proverbs 11:1): stated confidence never exceeds the evidence.

Download our capability statement (PDF)

Who we serve
Grant-funded nonprofits

The evaluation your grant requires, at a price your grant survives.

Veteran-serving organizations

Veteran-owned; we know the programs and the funders behind them.

County & city departments

Community surveys, program studies, and CX measurement.

Foundations & funders

Independent grantee evaluation you can point your portfolio to.

Public programs

Outcome reporting for the boards and councils you answer to.

Community coalitions

Needs assessments that ground the next initiative in evidence.

Common questions

Answered before you ask

What does an evaluation cost?
One fixed number, set in a written scope before any work begins. You tell us what you need to prove and to whom; we return a written scope and a single price. If the scope grows, we re-scope in writing. No hourly meters, no surprise invoices.
How fast can you deliver?
Your timeline is set in your written scope, and delivery is principal-led: intel-analyst rigor, not an academic calendar.
Why hire an outside evaluator at all?
Independence is the point. Third-party results carry weight with funders that self-reporting cannot, because an outside evaluator has no stake in the result.
What will the report look like?
See for yourself before you commit: the sample report above shows the format, the rigor, and the plain-language findings. Methods stated, limitations disclosed.

Have a report due or a survey to run?

Email me directly. You get an answer from the analyst, not a form queue.